Re: RFC: rpm auto-glib version enforcement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gene C. wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 05:56, Warren Togami wrote:

I added this to gaim.spec a while ago because users were installing
rawhide gaim compiled against glib2-2.6.x on FC3, which has glib2-2.4.x.
 gaim was then crashing because:

1) applications compiled against a newer glib are not backwards ABI
compatible.  AFAIK glib is supposed to be only forward ABI compatible. [1]
2) glib does not use verisoned so names
3) so rpm auto-dep cannot enforce compatible glib ABI version


Warren -- anyone who takes a binary package from an up-level release and tries to run it on a down-level system will likely get problems (e.g., from rawhide on FC3). While newbies may not understand this, experienced users should.

Somehow, there needs to be education that taking packages from up-level (e.g., rawhide) to be run on a down-level system MUST be rebuilt on the down-level systems.

I certainly understand your frustration with these "extra" bugzilla reports but there must be a better way than kluging the spec files.

"there must be a better way than kluging the spec files"
And I did propose a way that does this automatically without kludging spec files.


Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux