Re: peek package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 02/01/20 09:52, Artem Tim ha scritto:
> Perhaps OP should not sneaky asking for retiring functional package? Maybe he should instead file a bug and ask maintainer first about this and discuss with it? I might have miss this thread and didn't even notice it. TBH all this just demotivating from packaging something at all.
> _______________________________________________

In my original post I had CC'ed `peek-maintainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx` and 
I supposed this would have reached you directly. I did not know this 
isn't working anymore (I later received an unreachable address in 
reply). So I didn't "sneaky ask" anything.

That said, if this is working for Gnome out of the box without external 
dependencies, I apologize. I've just seen that the project homepage 
lists ffmpeg as runtime dependency. Indeed, a more descriptive error 
would be nice (and, maybe, viewable in a window message, not only from CLI).

Mattia

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux