Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable fstrim.timer by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fr, 20.12.19 13:39, Fedora Development ML (devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> On 20.12.2019 10:23, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > So, if this is desirable, why doesn't the kernel do this on its own?
>
> Kernel's TRIM has issues with data corruption on some SSD controllers.
> You can check drivers/ata/libata-core.c of Linux kernel sources for more
> information.

If that's the case, then what is different with the feature posted
here? in both cases it's the kernel that issues the TRIM, how would it
be safer to trigger that from a userspace program by default rather
than triggering that from a kernel-internal timer by default?

Why involve userspace in this at all? the kernel executes the actual
operation either way,  but why bother userspace with this?

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux