On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:29:36AM +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote: > On 19/12/19 01:00, David Cantrell wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 01:00:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Just FTR, for Red Hat Software Collections, we are (ab)using "Version" > >> BZ field to track the SCL version (e.g. [1]), which in module > >> terminology resembles stream. Maybe we could reuse something similar for > >> modules in Fedora. > > > > I think Fedora would have to do something like that to indicate module > > ownership in a bug. The Version field requires BZ maintenance for that > > list > > which could mean that each module version would need a new entry in that > > list. At least that's how I understand that BZ field the last time I > > looked > > at it. > > > > We could come up with syntax and place it in one of the Whiteboard fields. > > Something like module=eclipse;ver=X.Y.Z > > > > That would probably get ugly real fast. > > The version field is for the version of the product the bug is in, it > shouldn't be abused for things that aren't that. > > A couple of alternative approaches: > > 1: A new custom field with the modules/streams in it. User opens bug > against component, maintainer sets the CF if required. > > Pros: Easy to use. Could be a multi-select if it affects multiple streams. > > Cons: Might not scale to a large number of module streams. Doesn't allow > automated change of assignee/etc. Not easy to limit CF values to > specific components. > > 2: Use sub-components for the modules/streams. User opens a bug against > the component and the maintainer can move the bug to a module sub > component if required. > > Pros: easy to use, automated assignee/qe/etc, easy to limit modules and > streams to specific components. Unlikely to require significant change > to current workflows or tools. > > Cons: Setting up the sub-components, this could probably be automated on > the Fedora Infra side. Not multi-select so you'd need to clone bugs if > you wanted to track progress for multiple-streams. Isn't this what the module component's are for? Or do people think that it would be confusing to have a bug in say protobuf filed against eclipse module? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
