On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:39:52AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 4:24 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We're down to just two ocaml packages which failed to build. > > ocaml-tplib was already discussed. > > Do you have any idea what is going on with the ocaml-tplib build? It > is failing on ppc64le only. The failure happens when linking one of > the tests: > > _build/src/bindings/libtplib_double.a(tplib_double_callback.obj.o): in > function `camlStdlib__arg__assoc3_118': > (.text+0xe9258): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+101d0 > (.text+0xe9298): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+ffe8 > _build/src/bindings/libtplib_double.a(tplib_double_callback.obj.o): in > function `camlStdlib__arg__make_symlist_176': > (.text+0xe9400): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+10278 > (.text+0xe9438): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+10138 > _build/src/bindings/libtplib_double.a(tplib_double_callback.obj.o): in > function `camlStdlib__arg__fun_969': > (.text+0xe94a8): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+10138 > _build/src/bindings/libtplib_double.a(tplib_double_callback.obj.o): in > function `camlStdlib__arg__print_spec_242': > (.text+0xe9524): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+100d8 > (.text+0xe952c): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+10270 > (.text+0xe9570): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+101d8 > (.text+0xe9588): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+10048 > _build/src/bindings/libtplib_double.a(tplib_double_callback.obj.o): in > function `camlStdlib__arg__help_action_312': > (.text+0xe95f4): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_TOC16_DS against > `.toc'+ffe8 > (.text+0xe9614): additional relocation overflows omitted from the output > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [Makefile:157: _build/tests/test_tplib_double] Error 1 I don't know but it certainly looks like an upstream problem with the compiler and/or that the text segment or number of symbols is simply too large for relocation to cope. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
