Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, 10 December 2019 at 13:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 11. 19 21:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I'm sure there are other pain points and I encourage you to share
> > them. Please adhere to the guidelines about objectively measurable
> > issues, though.
> 
> M5. Modular packages are less secure than the nonmodular packages, because
> known security  vulnerabilities (CVEs) are not properly tracked within
> modules.
> 
> Reported as https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/169

Wow. That's serious.

How does Red Hat track these in RHEL8 and what's preventing Fedora from
doing the same?

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
        -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux