On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:04:53PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> FYI:
>
> rdma-core 26.1-1.fc32 dropped support for %arm:
>
> # 32-bit arm is missing required arch-specific memory barriers,
> ExcludeArch: %{arm}
>
> This broke dependecies for the arm package of openmpi
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780584)
>
> This may have affected other users of rdma-core, depending of if they use
> rdma on arm. Using my x86_64 machine:
>
Confirmed only openmpi impacted by this issue. Please see inline comments
for details.
Opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781765 for openmpi.
> $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires libibverbs.so.1'()(64bit)' --source
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:21 ago on Fri 06 Dec 2019 10:35:11 PM
> MST.
> ceph-14.2.4-3.fc32.src.rpm
ExcludeArch: i686 armv7hl
> dapl-2.1.9-10.fc31.src.rpm
dapl should be retired.
> fio-3.16-2.fc32.src.rpm
%ifnarch %{arm}
BuildRequires: numactl-devel
BuildRequires: librdmacm-devel
%endif
> ga-5.6.5-6.fc31.src.rpm
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64
> glusterfs-7.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
# No RDMA Support on armv7hl
%ifarch armv7hl
%global _without_rdma --disable-ibverbs
%endif
> libfabric-1.9.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
# RDMA not available on 32-bit ARM: #1484155
%ifnarch %{arm}
BuildRequires: libibverbs-devel
BuildRequires: librdmacm-devel
%endif
> libiscsi-1.18.0-9.fc32.src.rpm
%ifnarch %{arm}
BuildRequires: rdma-core-devel
%endif
> libocrdma-1.0.8-6.fc27.src.rpm
libocrdma should be retired.
> nwchem-6.8.2-1.fc32.src.rpm
ExclusiveArch: x86_64 %{ix86}
> openmpi-3.1.5-1.module_f32+7117+998651d7.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781765
> orangefs-2.9.7-6.fc31.src.rpm
%ifnarch armv7hl
BuildRequires: libibverbs-devel
%endif
> perftest-4.2-5.fc31.src.rpm
ExcludeArch: s390 s390x %{arm}
> qemu-4.2.0-0.3.rc2.fc32.src.rpm
qemu maintainer had fixed this issue.
> qperf-0.4.9-16.fc31.src.rpm
ExcludeArch: %{arm}
> rdma-core-26.1-1.fc32.src.rpm
It does not impact itself.
> scsi-target-utils-1.0.70-9.fc31.src.rpm
%ifnarch s390 s390x %{arm}
%global with_rdma 1
%endif
> ucx-1.6.1-1.fc32.src.rpm
# UCX currently supports only the following architectures
ExclusiveArch: aarch64 ppc64le x86_64
>
> This has also broken hwloc-devel on arm:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780813
>
> Is this a definite hard requirement, or can we have at least a minimal
> rdma-core for arm to avoid having to propagate a bunch of arm conditionals
> down the stack?
>
> --
> Orion Poplawski
> Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637
> NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
> 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx
> Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
