Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 20:18 -0500, Langdon White wrote:
> ## How to determine if you have an issue and how to fix it:
> 
> run: ```sudo dnf list --installed *protobuf*```
> if you get a result that looks like
> ```protobuf.x86_64  3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38```
> 
> you have encountered the problem. so please:
> 
> run: ```sudo dnf module disable eclipse```
> run:  ```sudo dnf downgrade protobuf```
> 
> Any updates, as of a few hours ago, should be fine.

I really think we should recommend 'dnf distro-sync', assuming it
actually does the job, as that should return *all* installed packages
from the newly-disabled modules to the non-modular builds, not just
protobuf.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux