On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:51 AM Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for CCing me (maintainer of protobuf here), I am particularly > not happy that some module (which is not even called protobuf, but > some random Java #$%! with ripped out python support overrides my > builds). > > I have put a proposal into a FESCo ticket. > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:44 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Today I've attempted to run "dnf upgrade". > > > > It has the following in it: > > > > Upgrading: > > protobuf x86_64 3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38e updates-modular > > > > Enabling module streams: > > ant > > eclipse > > maven > > > > > > I don't consider this behavior adequate for a released Fedora version. > > > > As a maintainer of dependent packages (Cura stack) I have tested and built it > > against the nonmodular protobuf. What just happened here and how do I track it down? > > > > dnf doesn't even tell me what module is this in. I suppose eclipse. > > > > However, protobuf was not mentioned in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2285 > > For the record, I've just pushed a temporary removal of the eclipse default stream, so the next compose will not have it. For those of you who are affected, your best bet would be to use `yum history rollback` and wait to update again until tomorrow. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
