Re: RFC: Modularity Simplified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/1/19 10:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I definitely want some mechanism which will tell to user that "THIS
PACKAGE IS NOT FULLY SUPPORTED."
And I think telling that to the user is absolutely unfair and against the 
spirit of Fedora.

The dilemma is, how to allow the useful stuff to remain, while preventing the accumulation of non-functional abandonware, especially since one person's trash might be someone else's treasure. It's not good when cruft accumulates, as it gives Fedora a  bad name and wastes people's time when they stumble into unsupported packages that stop working, like in this case:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490074

An 'unsupported' warning of some sort could be actually a good thing. Perhaps such warning could include a count of unresolved Bugzilla cases against the package in question.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux