Re: Is 50+ RPM Subpackages too extreme?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/27/19 6:49 PM, Chris wrote:
+ Sérgio: In regards to why sub-packages:
   * Purely for modularity and isolation.  Users who just use Apprise for... say Discord and Email, don't need the other 49 packages.  But someone hosting a notification web service might want all of them except the ones that utilize local libraries (one uses the DBus interface as an example). Each package has absolutely no external dependences except maybe 2.

Given that they're only one python file, making modules for each one seems rather excessive, especially since they don't have external dependencies. Depending on what the dependencies are for the two that do, it might be worth making subpackages for those only.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux