Re: Is 50+ RPM Subpackages too extreme?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 2019-11-27 10:37, Tom Hughes a écrit :
On 27/11/2019 09:30, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:

The clean way to do it is to put the list of things to generate against in a spec variable, and write the generator logic in a (lua) rpm macro. That keeps the generation inside the spec instead of moving some package creation steps outside our the shared and audited build infra.

How is a file in distgit "outside our the shared and audited build
infra" exactly? The spec file is just a file in distgit after all!

Yes, I misunderstood, as long as the generation logic is done inside the spec (via inlined macros, or detached files %{load}-ed), the end result is perfectly fine

What is not fine is when people use an external generator to write a spec file. And then fed this build output to the build infra. That moves spec assembly outside the normal managed build process.

Regards,

--
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux