Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06. 11. 19 8:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
M2.

For traditional packages, it was consistent and easy to find package dependencies in Fedora. For a proven packager, Fedora Packaging Committee member or generally for anybody doing a System Wide Change, being able to run queries like:

$ repoquery --repo=rawhide --whatrequires 'libpython3.8.so.1.0()(64bit)'

is trivial. Arguably, there are some quirks already (for example it doesn't properly work with boolean (rich?) deps).

Witch modules,  I still don't remember how to do this, but I know it requires more than 1 easy repoquery over rawhide.

This is also currently complicated by the fact that when Fedora N branches, the modules are not there on Fedora N+1 until they are rebuilt.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux