On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 3:19:59 PM MST Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > So people would prefer no packages at all over packages in modules? I ask > this as the traditional rpm way of doing is simply not working and that's > the reason why many of us (old time Java packagers) just gave up, it's > purely impossible to satisfy the needs of multiple "major" packages with > same set of dependencies. This is not Java problem only for sure - look at > Rust, Go, etc. I would being proved wrong but modularity at least gives an > option for RPMs to continue to be viable option. With all it's weirdness so > far no one gave better solution working to that extend at least. I'm sorry, but I don't know the exact issue you're describing here. I'd be glad to give a go at solving this particular issue, using traditional RPMs alone. -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
