Re: A more efficient up2date service using binary diffs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:06:55 +0000, Joe Desbonnet <jdesbonnet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Keeping a GB or two of RPMs on disk to enable this to happen is, I believe, a very small price to pay -- especially if the user can choose if they want to or not. I disagree that Windows does not require you to keep your OS distribution on disk. I believe most machines sold with XP come with complete re-install kits, often kept in a hidden partition.


Well that's really an interesting idea. If we're going to keep a copy of the rpms around, we might as well get the most milage we can out of them.


I don't really know if it would help me in my real use scenarios. When I've had a Linux install trashed it's either been a blown disk or hacked machine (who knows what they'll do to the reinstall kit.)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux