On 03. 10. 19 23:34, alciregi@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I'm trying to build an RPM of a python package.
The LICENSE file of the python package states that it is released under
MIT license.
But there is a file, _version.py, where you can read:
Parts of `extract_components` are taken from the pypa packaging project
(https://github.com/pypa/packaging) which is dual licensed:
This file is dual licensed under the terms of the Apache License,
Version
2.0, and the BSD License. See the LICENSE file in the root of (the
pypa)
repository for complete details.
The question is, what should I put in the License tag of the SPEC file?
MIT and (BSD or ASL 2.0)
Don't forget to put a comment into spec that explains this, like:
# mostly MIT, parts of extract_components from python-packaging (BSD or ASL 2.0)
License: MIT and (BSD or ASL 2.0)
Is MIT sufficient?
No.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
