On 03. 10. 19 15:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 03. 10. 19 v 11:58 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 10. 19 1:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm not sure how to handle the dychomoty between having different spec
files for each release and wanting to maintain just one spec that has a
bunch of crazy conditionals in it. Even thought I do this too, I think
we need a workflow that discourages this somehow.
I believe that moving release tag and changelog entry to annotated tags
solves this problem (or makes it insignificant).
It means you can just cleanly cherry pick a fix anywhere it is relevant
(most of the time) instead of fighting the changelog conflicts all the
time.
I don't understand the people actually maintaining different changelogs for
the releases. I just merge master into the release branches when I push an
update, and if that includes some changelog entries for Rawhide-only mass
rebuilds, so be it. Removing them is not worth breaking fast-forwardability
of the branches.
It depends how you maintain your packages. My guess is (and I am sorry
if I am mistaken) that you don't follow the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Philosophy
I do.
If you followed this policy, then you would touch the stable branches
just rarely and therefore keeping them fast forwardable would be just
waste of time.
I touch stable branches for bugfix upgrades.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
