Re: Old kernel RPMS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This discussion is not appropriate for fedora-devel-list. Your
> original question was much better suited for fedora-test-list.

Look, all I wanted to know is how to find some old kernel rpms.
I expected there to be some form of archive somewhere, and 
it seemed to me like the developers should know where it is.
I apologize if no such thing exists, and that's EOT. 

I don't see why this question is so inappropriate and irrelevant for
this list. In fact, it seems highly relevant to me, and I think
there should be a policy to keep backup versions of rpms in a
centralized place. I have needed such a thing on many occasions to
determine what was broken, or recover my system from a horrific crash,
due to Rawhide.

> And frankly I'm baffled about your comments here... considering that
> you are active in the livna bugzilla tickets and haven't reported
> these apparently new problems to the packagers via livna bugzilla. 

... I do not believe I have enough information at this point
to file a valuable bug report. I wanted to test old kernels
to determine the point of failure first. I also wanted to know
whether problems can arise from the interaction between gcc4-compiled
kernel, and binary kernel modules, and felt that the list was a more
appropriate place to ask this question.

-- 
Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cornell University


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux