Re: Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, thank you. I have requested a branch for f31 and epel8.

May be, there is no whitelist within fedora.

Regardless of this the package appears in the repo:
https://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/u/

Stefan

Am Di., 24. Sept. 2019 um 02:06 Uhr schrieb Scott Talbert <swt@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Stefan Koch wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > My package usbauth-notifier has passed the review:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
> >
> > The package have a repositiory now:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/usbauth-notifier
> >
> > I have created a build for my package:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c486836b68
> >
> > There were some errors at build:
> > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/364ec852-dc8e-11e9-8845-5
> > 2540077ca13/tests.yml/rpmgrill.json
> >
> > - "/usr/bin/usbauth-npriv": "Owned by group '<tt>usbauth</tt>'; files in
> > /usr/bin must be group 'root'"
> > - "File <var>/usr/bin/usbauth-npriv</var> is setuid root but is not on the
> > setxid whitelist."
> > - "File <var>/usr/libexec/usbauth-notifier/usbauth-notifier</var> is setgid
> > usbauth but is not on the setxid whitelist."
> >
> > Although there were errors, the package is now within the Rawhide
> > Repository:
> > https://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Every
> > thing/x86_64/os/Packages/u/usbauth-notifier-1.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm
> >
> > So is it needed to request adding it to the setxid whitelists?
> > Is it needed do move the usbauth-npriv binary away from /usr/bin? It must be
> > owned by the group usbauth, because of security architecture.
> > For the rpmlint errors I have provided now a rpmlintrc file athttps://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/usbauth-notifier/blob/master/f/usbauth-n
> > otifier.rpmlintrc
> >
> > Is there a way to get the package into the existing Fedora 31, 30 and EPEL 8
> > repositories?
>
> I don't know much about setxid whitelists so I can't answer your questions
> there.
>
> On getting your package into development and stable releases, yes, that is
> possible.  You first need to request branches be created using 'fedpkg
> request-branch".  Then once those have been processed, you can merge your
> changes to those branches, create builds, then create updates with bodhi
> to get those builds pushed stable.
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux