Coty Sutherland wrote:
> I'm working on (learning modularity) and developing a module for my
> package and created a not-so-great (super long) branch name in the
> dist-git rpm and module repo before I realized that it would be the
> stream's name too. Also, it seems that the incomplete module was picked up
> and included in F31; someone was nice enough to open a BZ and tell me it's
> broken. There are builds associated with the branch, so I probably can't
> delete it outright, but is there a way for me to hide (or something) that
> branch and use the correct one that I just requested? I think that `fedpkg
> retire` is the way to do it, but wanted to ask first since I can't find
> any supporting documentation. Or now that it's been included in F31 am I
> stuck with it (even thought it doesn't work)?
So Modularity will happily unleash experimental branches that were never
intended to be released onto unsuspecting users of stable releases? How can
this not be an absolute showstopper? This failed Modularity experiment needs
to end NOW!
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
