Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27. 09. 19 11:50, Fabien Boucher wrote:
    I remember that during the Python 3.8 rebuilds in the side tag, one package had
    this automated somehow already. I was bumping the release/changelog and trying
    to build it in the side tag at least 5 times, but I was building with
    --background, so the automation always got the NEVR in Koji first.

I guess it is python-gear ? Where I'm experimenting some automation based on Zuul CI. There is a job triggered to build in Koji when master ref change. This job can be trigger
instead when a PR is closed/merged, that way direct push will not trigger a build.

Yes. I've em-mailed you about the problem when it was happening, asking you to disable it, there was no reply and I managed to build it at the end.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux