On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:18:56AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > I guess the question is whether DKMS can be so modified and if so > > whether the result would be better than whatever other solutions > > people have come up with. > > # dkms build -m foo -v version -k some_kernel_version -a some_arch > # (repeat for different -k -a values) And how does this work with the 2.6 kernel ? Is it capable to build for different architectures from the same sources without the need of touching them ? I thought that was the main problem nowadays with 2.6, building the kernel modules as user for different archs without having to copy parts or the whole kernel tree. If it can do that, I may have to integrate dkms into my buildsystem :) -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
