Michal Schorm wrote: > Hello, > > Q: > Is it needed to explicitly list (or pack) license (files) of a library > that a package bundles? [1] > And if yes, what's the right way to do so? > > The built package only contain 1 binary (and it's manpage and license > file). In this case - when no sources are packed - I'd understand that > it is sufficient to list and pack only the single license of the > resulting project. > Is that correct? I think this faq should cover it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#What_is_.22effective_license.22_and_do_I_need_to_know_that_for_the_License:_tag.3F In short, you have the option of either tracking the single aggregate/combined-work (effective) license, or listing licenses of individual components. -- Rex _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
