On 2019-09-18, Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hm, did perl get moved to the modular repo? That sounds like it is going > to cause more issues than solve as it's not a leaf package. Why can't it > stay as a regular package? > Perl is still a regular package and until Fedora allows modules in a build root I wan't even start thinking about removing non-modular perl. But I provide modulerized perl in addition to the non-modular one. And there is indeed not much use of it if you don't want to sascrifice all the other Perl packages. Though, this crypto-tools error showed me one of the uses I did not realize before. I just found it interesting and wanted to pointed it out. I actually filed a feature request against DNF (bug #1753140) to report the module stream. When modules proliferate Fedora more, the amount of users who enabled a stream and cannot install a non-modular package will surge. Giving them a chance to know what module reset back to default is a handy. -- Petr _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
