Once upon a time, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > Only if you use DKMS as is. But if you take it as a starting point > (i.e. what Mr. Rugolsky suggested) and make its output not an > installed module but a kernel-module-whatever RPM then end users > wouldn't need the development packages. Someone can build and distribute kernel module RPMs today; they don't need DKMS for that. DKMS is a way for someone to distribute source so that users don't have to care that they updated to a new kernel. If they still have to download an RPM for the updated module, then nothing has changed. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
