(Cc'd reviewer/sponsor: eclipseo) On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 13:42:18 +0530, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote: > Hi All, Hi Muneendra, > An rpm package has been created by name fctxpd. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd > > > But my spec file name and the name field in my spec file is fc_txptd. > And my SRPM also has the name with fc_txptd. > And I push the SRPM with fc_txptd because of which fedpkg build is failing. > > fedpkg import PATH_TO_SRPM > git commit -m "Initial import (#XXXXXX)." > git push > fedpkg build > > Do I need to create a new SRPM with fctxpd and push the same again to git. Your spec file *must* have the same name as the package: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_spec_file_naming So, yes, correcting the name of the spec file will "fix" the issue. If, the name of the software, however, is fc_txptd, then it should've been reviewed as "fc_txptd" and the SCM repository be called "fc_txptd" also. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_general_naming I see the upstream repository is called "bsn-fc-txptd"---neither fc_txptd nor fxtxptd. Any reason not to use this as the spec and package name? https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/ -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
