On 2019-09-02, Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dne 02. 09. 19 v 14:25 Petr Pisar napsal(a): >> The point is that the one who designed these rules forgot that people >> will want to upgrade from an unsupported stream to a supportrf one. And >> that the upgrade should be silent and automatic for cases when a user > > Negative sir. > As I stated the change is documented here: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/managing-defaults/#_setting_or_changing_a_default > It is just, that it is first time it happened - Already tracked as: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747408 > That's in line with what I wrote: People defining the rules cannot see impact of their decisions. I know that this will happen imediately when somebody came up with "DNF must enable default streams" that it will break upgrades. I told that to DNF and Modularity people, but nobody listened. Maybe it's "for the first time" for you. Not for me. If you ask DNF people they will tell you that they do exactly what Modularity team tells them. If you ask Modularity people they will tell you that switching a stream must be a conscious action and thus it works as designed. -- Petr _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
