On 8/30/19 1:18 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 08. 19 18:25, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Not. If you're getting it on an installed system that you're upgrading, >> you probably need to manually switch the libgit2 module from the 0.27 >> stream to the 0.28 stream, that should clear it up. > > I'm hit by this when trying to upgrade to F31: > > Problém 2: problem with installed package > exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 > - package exa-0.9.0-2.module_f31+5365+04413d87.x86_64 requires > libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded > - package exa-0.9.0-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded > - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded > > > I have never installed any module explicitly. As an user, I'm confused > by this. > > If this indeed requires my intervention, maybe we should document it as > a common bug? I had an impression that this was fixed via: > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2146 > > I've opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747408 > > Is this a candidate for a blocker? This is the exact thing that was the subject of a long thread recently I think. My understanding: Basically libgit2 was made modular and default. But when you switch from f30->f31 the default version changes, but dnf doesn't allow that unless the user chooses to change streams Which way are you doing the upgrade? just a distro-sync? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
