Ok, that makes sense; thanks for the clarification. :)
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:03 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 19. 08. 19 15:31, Chris wrote:
> I'm getting a rawhide (auto) build issue with my package:
> Error: churchyard's python-apprise-0.7.9-3.fc32 failed to build
>
> Source:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1359009
Note that this is not a rawhide build but a f32-python side tag build.
> When you follow through to the error it comes down to the build.log
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6735/37146735/root.log
>
> Which shows that the 'Requires: python3-requests-oauthlib' is hauling in the
> version from fc31 and failing on:
> `nothing provides python(abi) = 3.7`
>
> This is more of a question to the forum; not a complaint:
>
> Will my package that failed to build due to a dependency issue global to rawhide
> be rebuilt when the bad dependency is eventually upgraded to Python 3.8? Or do
> I need to rebuild it myself again later and pass it through testing?
I am taking care of all the rebuilds that are possibly to be made. That means if
python-requests-oauthlib is able to be rebuilt, python-apprise will be rebuilt
as well. However if python-requests-oauthlib fails to build for other reason
than failed dependency (or transitively a dependency of it fails), I will not
rebuild it.
In this case, python-requests-oauthlib was already built and so was python-apprise.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
