Re: bootctl: no entry could be determined as default (Was: Upgrade to F30 gone wrong)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:14 AM Dridi Boukelmoune
<dridi.boukelmoune@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Well, it went through many revisions, and some of the bits are very
> > recent. For example, the pre-boot random seed stuff has been added in
> > v243, of which we only posted an -rc1 so far,
> >
> > However, the basics have been around very early on, yes.
>
> Well, from someone not versed in bios, efi and bootloaders the spec
> looks reasonable. Now I'm wondering why Fedora doesn't implement the
> interface. Is it only a matter of someone driving the change? Was
> there some push-back? Or is it more complicated because it needs to
> involve the installer and a dozen other components?

Implementing the interface needs to happen in the bootloader. Someone
would need to do the work in GRUB in a way that GRUB upstream will
accept. And then Fedora will get it when rebasing.

-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux