Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change: glusterfs dropping 32-bit arches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Kevin Kofler:

> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I think that's only a problem if reported bugs don't get fixed.  If such
>> bugs are fixed, shipping everything that builds aligns well with
>> building a community-tested distribution.
>> 
>> Exceptions could be software that leads to purchases of some kind, based
>> on an incorrect assumption of Fedora support due to the existence of the
>> non-working package.
>
> Well, that would exclude a lot of hardware drivers, and make Fedora pretty 
> useless. (You cannot realistically test Fedora on all hardware on which 
> users want to use it.)

You dropped too much context here.  Drivers which are rottenware (Panu's
term) are exactly in this category.  We can only hope that upstreams
remove them, based on feedback from the larger community.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux