On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 04:05 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:30 AM Normand <normand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The list of deliverables is drastically shorter for 31 (1) than it was > > for 30 (4) ! > > > It only looks that way because the Fedora 31 list *only* includes the > blocking deliverables. Previous releases included all deliverables, > and blocker status was indicated by a column in the table. > > > Why ppc64le, s390x deliverables not listed for 31 release ? > > > They do not currently block the release. That doesn't mean we do not make them. Well, the page also lists a ton of other things that aren't release blocking, which is why it has the 'release blocking' column. If it were truly a list of only the blocking deliverables it'd be even shorter. I don't remember (or never knew) why we have a page called 'ReleaseBlocking' which lists non-blocking deliverables, but I'd say at least it should list *all* the deliverables with a column marking whether they're blocking, or *only* list the blocking deliverables. Listing some-but-not-all non-blocking deliverables doesn't make any sense at all. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
