Re: fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I wrote:

> Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
>> No, that's not correct. Header-only libraries are not noarch, and
>> disable debug packages.
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_header_only_libraries
> 
> Well, if there is no testsuite and if the headers are truly
> architecture-independent (those are the 2 reasons the guidelines give as a
> rationale for making the packages arch-specific), I don't see a good
> reason to not make them noarch.

PS: Oh, and if there is a testsuite to run, but the headers are truly
architecture-independent, you can at least make -devel a noarch subpackage
with no ill effect. (Koji will actually fail your build if the headers turn
out to differ based on the architecture, so it is perfectly safe, unlike the
completely noarch package where it is up to YOU to ensure that the contents
do not depend on the architecture.) Though, in that case (noarch
subpackage), you do still have to disable the debug packages explicitly.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux