On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 03:56:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 08. 19 15:36, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > There is a proposal[1] in upstream GlusterFS to drop 32-bit arches. > > > > The original proposal was to drop 32-bit with GlusterFS-7. GlusterFS-7 > > will land in Fedora 31/rawhide soon. More than likely though it will not > > be official until GlusterFS-8, which will probably land, accordingly, > > after Fedora 31 GA in Fedora 32/rawhide. > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/702 > > What about the dependent packages? > > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires glusterfs-devel > glusterfs-api-devel-0:6.4-3.fc31.i686 > glusterfs-api-devel-0:6.4-3.fc31.x86_64 > libvirt-0:5.5.0-2.fc31.src > qemu-2:4.1.0-0.1.rc2.fc31.src > samba-2:4.10.6-0.fc31.2.src > uwsgi-0:2.0.18-2.fc31.src > > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires glusterfs-api-devel > gluster-block-0:0.4-4.fc31.src > glusterfs-coreutils-0:0.3.1-2.fc31.src > libvirt-0:5.5.0-2.fc31.src > nfs-ganesha-0:2.8.2-3.fc31.src > qemu-2:4.1.0-0.1.rc2.fc31.src > samba-2:4.10.6-0.fc31.2.src > scsi-target-utils-0:1.0.70-9.fc31.src > tcmu-runner-0:1.1.3-2.fc26.src > uwsgi-0:2.0.18-2.fc31.src This is no big deal from libvirt/qemu POV. We've already trivially adapted to ceph being purged from 32-bit archs by adding conditionals. The same is trivial for glusterfs too. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
