Re: mass rebuild, glusterfs build failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 08:58:11PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 8:19 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/25/19 11:05 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > > hmmm.  from the root.log
> > >
> > > DEBUG util.py:585:  BUILDSTDERR: Error:
> > > DEBUG util.py:585:  BUILDSTDERR:  Problem: conflicting requests
> > > DEBUG util.py:585:  BUILDSTDERR:   - nothing provides kernel >= 4.18.0
> > > needed by firewalld-0.6.4-1.fc31.noarch
> > >
> > > how to deal with this?  Wait for a new firewalld package?

Dependencies on kernel packages are pointless. Kernels are multi-install,
so even having a kernel package in the right version doesn't mean that
it is running. Additionally there are various environments (e.g. containers)
where the kernel is provided externally, without the kernel package being
installed. firewalld.rpm should just drop the dependency.

>   - nothing provides kernel-modules needed by ecryptfs-utils-111-18.fc31.i686

That's even more pointless here.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux