Oh wow, it's already that time in the Fedora 31 release cycle. Welcome to the first Fedora 31 Beta blocker status email! Action summary ==================== Accepted blockers ----------------- 1. bes — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728419 ACTION: Server WG to decide if it makes sense to include "a DAP server" in the optional packages for the web-server group. 2. libdnf — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727343 ACTION: QA to verify libdnf-0.35.1-2 fixes the bug Proposed blockers ----------------- 1. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732620 ACTION: anaconda maintainers to build new package which includes upstream fix 2. gnome-shell — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731908 ACTION: gnome-shell maintainers to verify the issue is resolved after rebuild 3. initial-setup — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731415 ACTION: initial-setup maintainers to diagnose issue 4. kernel — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388 ACTION: QA team to determine if btrfs should be excluded from blocker criteria and perhaps propose dropping it from the installer 5. systemd — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715699 ACTION: decide if this qualifies as a blocker Bug-by-bug detail ============= Accepted blockers ----------------- 1. bes — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728419 — NEW bes not installable: needs rebuild, probably update to 3.20.5 Package was added to comps to replace dap-server package which no longer exists. It's unclear if the comps group should continue to carry bes as an optional package. If it can be dropped, this is no longer a blocker. If it should remain, the bes package needs to be fixed. 2. libdnf — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727343 — ON_QA PackageKit: libdnf::Repo::Impl::detachLibsolvRepo(): packagekitd killed by SIGSEGV Appears to be fixed in libdnf-0.35.1-2. Proposed blockers ----------------- 1. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732620 — MODIFIED FreeIPA enrolment via kickstart fails since Fedora-Rawhide-20190722.n.1 (anaconda-31.20-1.fc31), 'realm join' step not run at all Fix merged upstream: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2052 2. gnome-shell — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731908 — NEW After upgrading gnome-shell, mutter and gnome-desktop3 to version 3.33.4-1 disappear login screen Suspected to be related to a soname bump in libgnome-desktop. If so, it will be resolved when components are rebuilt against the new version. 3. initial-setup — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731415 — NEW Network spoke doesn't work on ARM initial-setup Selecting the "network setup" spoke causes installation to hang on Raspberry Pi 3. 4. kernel — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388 — NEW Circular locking often causes btrfs installs to hang with kernel-5.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc31 and later Installations since kernel-5.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc31 often fail during package installation. The kernel team proposes excluding btrfs from any blocker criteria. 5. systemd — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715699 — POST LiveOS boot, journalctl is missing many early messages Rejected as a blocker previously, but renominated. The question is: does missing the first ~25 seconds of log messages violate the "is working" part of the logging criterion? -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
