>>>>> "RF" == Richard Fearn <richardfearn@xxxxxxxxx> writes: RF> According to RF> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures: >> If a Fedora package does not successfully compile, build or work on >> an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the >> spec in ExcludeArch. Sure, but also just a small bit further down the document is https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_noarch_with_unported_dependencies which tells you what to do if you have a noarch package that has dependencies which are not present on all architectures. This involves some rather odd magic in koji, and so what is in the guidelines is the best information that we've been able to extract from releng and the koji source code. Can you try the ExclusiveArch: method shown in the example, keeping in mind that you must explicitly list "noarch" at the end? Of course, a successful build isn't a guarantee because the build host you get may be completely random. What we'd like to know is if someone finds a failure using the recommended method (which would imply that we need to get something fixed or find another way to accomplish this). - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
