On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:23:52 +0100, Remco Poelstra <remco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A thread a month ago, with no real results (as far as I can judge) is > not really something I call 'active'. i'm just making sure you have read it... as a reference. You wanted to have an understanding of what red hat internal discussion was.... that thread is probably the best discussion to-date on this list concerning printing configuration and was conducted primarily among red hat developers who are spending some effort on the issue. More likely than not more discussion relating to that thread has continued between tim and john elsewhere, since tim gave every indication that he was seeking input on something he was 'actively' working on the issue of replacing s-c-printer. John's posts in the thread detailing how desktop printing confuration is currently handled seems particularly relevant to your proposal... so i wanted to make sure you have read it.. so that you would be better prepared to talk specifics with the specific red hat developers. -jef"give me an R. give me an E. give me a S. give me an E. give me an A. give me an R. give me a C. give me an H. What's that spell!"spaleta
