Re: are the ppc64le builders healthy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/23/19 11:36 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "KK" == Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> KK> I built the latest ceph-14 (14.2.2) on rawhide successfully two days
> KK> ago.  Two different builds on f30 built or are building fine on
> KK> x86_64, i686, and aarch64, but failed with different errors on
> KK> ppc64le at different places in the build.  One looks like it ran out
> KK> of space in the file system. The other may have been OOM killed (?).
> 
> There was just a bit of talk about this in IRC.  The issue seems to be
> that the CPU count of the PPC64le builders was bumped from 4 to 12, but
> the amount of memory was unchanged at 10GB RAM/2GB swap.  This could
> potentially cause resource exhaustion.
> 
> Seems they've now been bumped to 22GB of RAM, which should help with OOM
> issues but probably not with disk space issues.

Right. Please file a ticket or let us know if you hit the disk issue again.

kevin


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux