Hi,
this is probably question for mutter/gnome-shell maintainers. But as I see it, there is a reason why are those patches not backported into stable branches in upstream. There can be regressions, the thing that you have zero issues doesn't mean anybody else won't have them. Backporting those patches into stable releases for testing is not a great idea. There is COPR (and Rawhide) for this.
I personally don't have any issues with GNOME performance on both of my machines (AMD and Intel GPU), and would regret having development patches backported when upstream decided not to backport them.Having a COPR repo with those patches as an opt-in option is IMO the ideal solution for Fedora.
Maybe, the COPR repo deserves more publicity/article on fedoramag, post on /r/Fedora and so on for people having performance issues.
But of course, you can make the PR against gnome-shell, mutter and discuss the matter with maintainers, or wait for their reply here (you can try sending this to fedora-desktop ML).
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
