Re: true or false: pkgconfig(foo) vs foo-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> Depending on the package name is not a way to state you're not using
> pkgconfig, it's a way to get broken builds when the package you depend
> on gets restructured.

On the other hand, there are also cases where pkgconfig(foo) can break:
* if compatibility libraries provide the same pkg-config interface, as
  pointed out by kwizart,
* if competing (drop-in replacement) libraries provide the same pkg-config
  interface,
* if the package drops pkg-config support (either because upstream dropped
  it or because it was a downstream patch to begin with),
* if the .pc file was actually for a part of the -devel package that is not
  used and that was dropped, e.g., pkgconfig(xxf86misc) in
  xorg-x11-proto-devel,
etc.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux