On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 10:25 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Nathanael Noblet: > > > I have been using a library for awhile now and have been > > thinking > > of submitting it to Fedora. Part of what I have been doing with > > it > > was compiling it using -fsanitize=address and leak etc. I’m > > kinda > > wondering about how that is handled with Fedora packages. Are we > > able to / should we provide library package versions that are > > compiled against these kinds of sanitizers? > > Address Sanitizer does not provide ABI stability itself, and also > removes ABI stability for glibc functions. In general, you cannot > use it for distribution builds. Right, I think I didn't communicate it clearly. What I meant was having like libfoo and libfoo-sanitized or something like that that conflict with each other so you could install libfoo-sanitized for debug purposes. It seems that the answer is likely no need to do it. > > > Or if someone wants to do that they should recompile the RPM > > with > > those flags and use it locally? > > Yes, rebuilding the RPM or the upstream sources is currently the only > way. > > Thanks, > Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
