Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/15/19 3:11 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I just don't think the number of people who do local i686 builds is all
>> that large, so it having some issues and corner cases to help out the
>> vast majority of folks seems like a good trade off to me.
> 
> Removing something does not "help out" anybody, ever. The people who'd 
> better not use the repo can just opt to not use it. You don't have to delete 
> it under them. And those who will use it probably have a good reason to use 
> it.

This argument is absurd. Removing something definitely helps out the
people who were producing it, if they no longer wish to spend resources
making it. If the people using it wish it to stay around, they would
have to take over producing it.

kevin



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux