Neal Gompa wrote:
> I know it’s beating a dead horse, but I’d rather have the buildsystem
> *deal* with such a trivial problem than require manual intervention.
> Cycling through and building things properly in order to deal with a
> soname bump is something our tooling should do for us.
And how is the tooling supposed to do that automatically if a
straightforward rebuild fails due to a circular dependency, as happened with
gnutls in this case?
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
