I think that we will end-up with this slightly edited version of the proposal :) > Keep Bundler 1.16 as rubygem-bundler1 subpackage of ruby package. The problem is that Ruby ships with bundled Bundler 1.x and
RubyGems depends Bundler 1.x. Although I'm not sure how tight the
coupling is :/ Upstream acts as the RubyGems and Bundler are
inseparable, but I believe that the coupling is useful just for
some niche use case. So the proposal is to move the independent rubygem-bundler into Bundler 2.x and replace the rubygem-bundler subpackage of ruby package by rubygem-bundler1 subpackage and keep it around as long as RubyGems does not migrate to the new version. Also, if I am not mistaken, the Gemfile.lock created by Bundler
can enforce the version of Bundler required. Please note that it should be safe to install rubygem-bundler1
alongside the rubygem-bundler.
Vít
Dne 10. 07. 19 v 20:49 Igor Gnatenko
napsal(a):
|
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx