Re: 64bit clean AMD64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I would question what you mean by "clean". It is clean already. 64-bit
libraries and 32-bit libraries are clearly separated and there is no
confusion. Most of your apps are compiled 64-bit , some with 32-bit
libraries for backward compatibility. Not every app (open office for
instance) is 64-bit ready. You know the difference is that IA-64 has
NO backward compatibility with anything else. There is a lot of
software that written for Linux (non open source of course) that is
compiled for 32-bit Linux (the most popular Linux). Your system is
going to run at the same speed with or without 32-bit libraries. Also
as mentioned above you can just manually remove them if they bother
you that much. But you may one day need a program that is not 64-bit
ready.  I think your wining is ridiculous.

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 04:00:21 +0100, Thomas Zehetbauer
<thomasz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You always get some unnecessary packages, even with pure bitness
> installations, for example pcmcia-cs, just remove them manually.
> 
> Tom
> 
> --
>   T h o m a s   Z e h e t b a u e r   ( TZ251 )
>   PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89
>       finger thomasz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx for key
> 
> Why do you call your dog 1234?
> My admin told me not to name my password after my dog.
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 
> 
>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux