On 26. 06. 19 12:25, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:01 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 26. 06. 19 10:59, Bob Mauchin wrote:
At least this is enforced for any new package, I make sure of it. But for
existing ones, we can maybe grep .so* to fix them.
$ rg -lF '.so*' rpm-specs/ | env LANG=en_US.utf8 sort
[...]
rpm-specs/snapd.spec
[...]
This spec doesn't have any shared objects, it just happens to match
because the string exists in the changelog. There may be other false
positives like that, so be careful...
No allegations about the listed specs at all, except that they match the
pattern. In no way I have said: those packages are bad and should be fixed.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
