On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:42 +0000, Carwyn Edwards wrote: >Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: > >>We're planning on >>natively-compiling rawhide ant >> >Will this have an alternatives setup so that you can run a non native >ant too? > No, that isn't needed. The java and javac alternatives cover this. If they point to java-1.4.2-gcj-compat and java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-devel ant will run natively on a completely Free Software stack. If they point to a proprietary SDK then ant will run interpreted/JIT'ed on the non-free JVM. Tom
