On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 2:29 PM Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, at 4:47 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:12:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > I would actually really like to see rpm's multiversioning capabilities > > > extended to support this. > > > > I'd actually prefer to drop the multiversion mode for the kernel and > > instead add the version to the kernel package name. > > FWIW in rpm-ostree we go to some lengths to explicitly undo the libdnf default of multiple versions for the kernel, because the ostree side of things effectively multi-versions all of userspace as well. We're always creating a new root, so there's no concern about removing modules from the running kernel (any more than there is a similar concern for userspace components). An ostree deployment includes a (kernel+initramfs,userspace) as a pair; two deployments can happen to share a kernel, or not. A bit more info in > https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/1346 RPM-OSTree is functionally irrelevant in this discussion, since it has its own behavior patterns and eschews compatibility with the greater ecosystem anyway. It doesn't even support modules, so this whole discussion doesn't even matter for systems built on RPM-OSTree. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
