Re: Modularity vs. libgit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Samalik wrote:
> So, I'd like to discuss the libgit issue [1] [2] we're experiencing. With
> a help of a few people, I've put together this post to get us on common
> ground: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/modularity-vs-libgit/
> 
> There are few ideas about solving the issue right now. But we might be
> able to think about better ways to deal with similar issues long-term.
> Let's do this!
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1717117
> [2] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2146#comment-575852

As I had posted in a blog comment:

This is exactly the dependency hell (different packages/modules depending on 
incompatible versions of the same module) that I had been warning about ever 
since modularity has first been discussed in Fedora. I pointed out from day 
one that this is a showstopper that makes modularity entirely impractical 
and unsupportable. My concerns were dismissed or ignored. Now you are seeing 
exactly the situation that I had been warning about from day one.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux